PrivacyCopyright and Disclaimer SitemapFeedbackHelpSearch
Home
About Us
Recent News
Current Projects
Publications - Active
Digest
Contribute to Law Reform
Law Reform Links
Contact Us
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Report 89 (1999) - Contribution Between Persons Liable for the Same Damage

Report 89 (1999) - Contribution Between Persons Liable for the Same Damage


CONTENTS

 

Terms of reference

Participants

Glossary of terms and abbreviations

List of recommendations

 

1. INTRODUCTION

THE COMMISSION’S REFERENCE

THE LAW OF CONTRIBUTION

Joint wrongdoers and several wrongdoers at common law

      Joint wrongdoers

      Several wrongdoers

Contribution

The rule in Merryweather v Nixan

Statutory variation of the common law

 

2. SOLIDARY LIABILITY

JOINT AND SEVERAL OR SOLIDARY LIABILITY

PROPORTIONATE LIABILITY

THE INTERIM REPORT (LRC 65)

DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE INTERIM REPORT

The Davis Report

Discussion Paper on Contribution

Recent developments in other jurisdictions

      New Zealand

      Canada

      Victoria

      The American experience

THE ARGUMENTS

Policy issues

      Limited introductions of proportionate liability
Procedural issues
      The burden of conduct of proceedings

      General issues

      Effect on settlements

      Dangers of non-uniform approach

      Conclusion

Economic issues
      Effect on liability insurance

      Deterrence to entry to the professions

      Deterrence to entrepreneurial enterprise/service provision

      Incentive to be risk averse

Conclusion

 

3. WHERE CONTRIBUTION ARISES

ENSURING COVERAGE OF ALL TORTFEASORS

Torts that are crimes

Intentional torts

Torts of strict liability

EXTENSION TO MIXED CONCURRENT WRONGDOERS

Difficulties in extending the right to contribution

      Different nature of liability

      The effect of concurrent liability

      Adding to the complexity of the law

The benefit of a contractual term limiting liability
      Determining the contributable sum
Conclusions
      Legislative implementation

      Application of the legislative scheme

EXTENSION TO STATUTORY SCHEMES

 

4. WHEN CONTRIBUTION ARISES

WHERE P OBTAINS JUDGMENT AGAINST D1

Finality of judgment as to liability against D1

      Consent judgments and judgments obtained by fraud or collusion

      Conclusion

Finality of judgment as to quantum against D1

WHERE D1 AND P SETTLE WITHOUT JUDGMENT

Full settlements

      Where D1 was never liable to P

      The sum to be apportioned

Partial settlements
      Releases and indemnities
WHERE P FAILS IN AN ACTION AGAINST D2

Where D2 successfully defends an action “on the merits”

Where P’s action against D2 is time barred

Where P fails for want of prosecution

Where D2 is found not liable in third party proceedings

BASIS OF APPORTIONMENT OF LIABILITY

 

5. PROCEDURAL

SANCTION IN COSTS

SANCTION IN DAMAGES

THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN JOINT WRONGDOERS

AND SEVERAL WRONGDOERS

Judgment bar rule

Settlement bar rule

Single judgment rule

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS

Limitation period relevant to the primary cause of action

Limitation period for contribution actions

      Length of limitation period

      Extension to rights of contribution between all concurrent wrongdoers

 

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED

APPENDIX B: CONSULTATIONS

TABLE OF LEGISLATION

TABLE OF CASES

BIBLIOGRAPHY

INDEX



Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 28 May 2001   Crown Copyright 2002 ©  
Hosted by
Lawlink NSW