|
|
 |
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Table of Cases
Discussion Paper 42 (1999) - Uniform Succession Laws: Administration of Estates of Deceased Persons
Table of Cases
| Albert, Re (1967) | 17.26, 17.27, 17.30, 17.33 |
| Allhusen v Whittell (1867) | 8.172, 8.174 |
| Anderson, Re (1953) | 8.66 |
| Atkinson (deceased), Re (1971) | 8.99 |
| Attenborough v Solomon (1913) | 8.108 |
| Attorney-General (UK) v Jackson (1932) | 15.23 |
| Attorney-General v Eyles (1889) | 9.39 |
| Axon v Axon (1937) | 17.4, 17.12 |
| Balajan v Nikitin (1994) | 3.13 |
| Bankinvest v Seabrook (1988) | 3.16 |
| Bath v British and Malayan Trustees Ltd (1969) | 5.27 |
| Benjamin, Re (1902) | 5.21, 17.8, 17.13, 17.15, 17.19, 17.54, 17.56, Q17.8 |
| Beverly, Re (1901) | 8.149 |
| Beynon v Gollins (1788) | 8.61 |
| Bigg v Keen (1752) | 5.28 |
| Birch v Birch (1902) | 2.19 |
| Bowles, Re (1952) | 2.18 |
| Broughton, In re (1902) | 12.25 |
| Brush, Re (1962) | 17.22 |
| Budd v Silver (1813) | 5.28 |
| Calcino v Fletcher (1969) | 15.36 |
| Cameron v Murdoch (1983) | 9.10 |
| Chave, Re (1930) | 5.8 |
| Cope v Bennett (1911) | 9.39 |
| Cowell, Will of (1895) | 8.66 |
| Darrington v Caldbeck (1990) | 6.5, 12.18 |
| Davies v Littlejohn (1923) | 15.130 |
| Diplock, Re (1948) | 9.50, 16.10 |
| Dix v Burford (1854) | 8.108 |
| Dixon, Estate of (1969) | 17.26, 17.30 |
| Doolette, Re (1933) | 9.39 |
| Douglas, Estate of (1908) | 9.39 |
| Douglas, Will of (1951) | 8.95 |
| Dubois v Trant (1700) | 7.14 |
| Egen (deceased), Re (1951) | 9.40 |
| Flaherty v Girgis (1985) | 3.15 |
| Flynn, Re (1982) | 2.18 |
| Gannon, Will of (1915) | 8.66 |
| Gibbon’s Will, Re (1889) | 8.87 |
| Green’s Will Trusts, Re (1985) | 17.9 |
| Halbert v Mynar (1981) | 17.26-17.28, 17.31-17.33 |
| Harvell v Foster (1954) | 8.108, 9.39 |
| Heslop, Goods of (1846) | 7.14 |
| Hickman v Peacey (1945) | 17.24, 17.26 |
| Higstrim v Ray (1895) | 8.66 |
| Hill, Re (1988) | 8.53 |
| Holden v Black (1904) | 9.39 |
| Howe v Earl of Dartmouth (1802) | 8.44 |
| Jackson, Re (1902) | 17.6 |
| Jensen, Re (1982) | 9.26 |
| Jensen, Re (1998) | 5.13 |
| Johnston, Estate of (1899) | 7.14 |
| Keenan, Re (1899) | 8.129 |
| Kempthorne, In re; Charles v Kempthorne (1930) | 15.36, 15.39, 15.50 |
| Kerr v Palfrey (1970) | 3.3 |
| Kirk v Todd (1882) | 14.1 |
| Korvine’s Trust, Re; Levashoff v Block (1921) | 15.65 |
| Lack, Re (1983) | 8.87 |
| Lamb, Re; Vipond v Lamb (1929) | 15.50 |
| Lindop, Re (1942) | 17.21 |
| Loveday, Goods of (1900) | 8.124 |
| Lyndon, Will of (1960) | 10.36 |
| Mackenzie, Estate of (1909) | 5.28 |
| Maddock v Registrar of Titles (Vic) (1915) | 6.2 |
| McCormack, Re (1902) | 5.8 |
| McInnes, Re (1939) | 5.28 |
| Meyappa Chetty v Supramanian Chetty (1916) | 12.3 |
| Milne, Re (1952) | 5.28 |
| Osborne v Smith (1960) | 2.19 |
| Pearce, Re (1936) | 8.151 |
| Permezel v Hollingworth (1905) | 8.196 |
| Phillips, Re (1906) | 5.28 |
| Poyer, Goods of (1856) | 5.28 |
| Quirk v Thomas (Executor of) (1916) | 14.1 |
| Ralston, Re (1906) | 8.196 |
| Rees v Hughes (1946) | 8.18 |
| Reilly, Will of (1907) | 5.28 |
| Rowe v Silverstein (1996) | 3.16 |
| Russell v Williams (1953) | 2.18 |
| Sloan, Re; Stevens v Sloan (1943) | 15.115 |
| Sloper v Cottrell (1856) | 8.108 |
| Tucke’s case (Sir Brian) | 8.61 |
| Watkinson, Re (1952) | 17.26 |
| Wester Wemyss, Re; Tilley v Wester Wemyss (1940) | 15.23 |
| Whitmore, Re (1929) | 9.39 |
| Wigley v Grozier (1909) | 8.149 |
| Wilson, Decd, In re; Wilson v Mackay and Others (1967) | 15.39 |
| Young v Holloway (1895) | 2.19 |
|
