|
|
 |
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > 42. Criminal procedure
DIGEST OF LAW REFORM COMMISSION REFERENCES
42. Criminal procedure

| 
| 
[Link to terms of reference]
|

Received: | 
| 
17 January 1982 |

Discussion Paper 9: | 
| 
Unsworn Statements of Accused Persons, May 1980 (originally issued under Reference 13: Evidence) |

Report 45: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: Unsworn Statements of Accused Persons, October 1985 |

| 
| 
Tabled in Parliament 31 October 1985 |

Legislative action: | 
| 
No legislation was required to implement this Report. However, the right to make an unsworn statement was subsequently abolished by the Crimes Legislation (Unsworn Evidence) Amendment Act 1994 (NSW) which inserted s 404A into the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (now Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 31). |

| 
| 
|

Issues Paper 3: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: General Introduction and Proceedings in Courts of Petty Sessions, 1982 |

| 
| 
[An Outline of the Paper was also published] |

| 
| 
|

Preliminary paper: | 
| 
Robert L Misner, "Legislatively Mandated Speedy Trials" (1984) 8 Criminal Law Journal 17
[A report to the New South Wales Law Reform Commission, which was made possible by a grant from the Law Foundation of New South Wales.]
|

Discussion Paper 12: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: The Jury in a Criminal Trial, September 1985 |

Judicial Citation: | 
| 
Otis Elevators Pty Ltd v Zitis (1986) 5 NSWLR 171, 202
Wu v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 99, [42]
R v PZG (2007) 171 A Crim R 62, [20] |

Research Report 1: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: The Jury in a Criminal Trial: Empirical Studies, June 1986 |

Judicial Citation: | 
| 
Pahuja v The Queen (1987) 30 ACrimR 118 |

| 
| 
Cheatle v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 541, 562 |

Report 48: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: The Jury in a Criminal Trial, March 1986 |

| 
| 
Tabled in Parliament 30 April 1986 |

Legislative Action: | 
| 
Jury (Amendment) Act 1987 |

| 
| 
Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1988
Crimes Legislation Amendment (Procedure) Act 1997 |

Judicial Citation: | 
| 
Cheatle v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 541 at 562 |

| 
| 
R v Taousanis (1999) 146 ACrimR 303 (NSW SC), [7], [10], [12], [20] |

| 
| 
Katsuno v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 40, [97] |

| 
| 
Wu v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 99, [46] |

| 
| 
R v Laws (2000) 50 NSWLR 96, [30], [31], [34]
R v MM (2004) 145 ACrimR 148 (NSW CCA), [138]
R v Lavender (2005) 218 ALR 521 (HC), [89]
R v NZ [2005] NSWCCA 278, [188]
R v Tichowitsch [2006] QCA 569, [3]
Vella v Western Australia (2007) 33 WAR 411, [75] |

Journal articles: | 
| 
J H Phillips, "The calling of expert evidence-in-chief - a new approach" (1989) 63 Australian Law Journal 545 |

| 
| 
|

Discussion Paper 13: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: Procedure from Charge to Trial: A General Proposal for Reform, December 1986 |

Discussion Paper 14: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: Procedure from Charge to Trial: Specific Problems and Proposals, February 1987 |

Judicial Citation: | 
| 
Barron v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 10 NSWLR 215, 233 |

| 
| 
Aboud v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 10 NSWLR 671, 679 |

| 
| 
Kintominas v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 24 A Crim R 456, 462 |

| 
| 
Hilton v Hyde (NSW SC, No S18236-7/85, Hunt J, 29 April 1987, unreported), 4 |

| 
| 
R v Elshaw [1991] 3 SCR 24 |

| 
| 
|

Discussion Paper 16: | 
| 
Criminal Procedure: Police Powers of Arrest and Detention, August 1987 |

Judicial Citation: | 
| 
R v Walsh (NSW, Court of Criminal Appeal, No 60257/89, 18 October 1990, unreported) per Samuels JA at 20 |

Report 66: | 
| 
Police Powers of Detention and Investigation after Arrest, December 1990 |

| 
| 
Tabled in Parliament 20 February 1991 |

Legislative Action: | 
| 
Crimes Amendment (Detention After Arrest) Act 1997 |

Judicial Citation: | 
| 
R v Savvas (1991) 55 ACrimR 241 |

| 
| 
R v McKinney (NSW SC, No 60335/92, Wood J, 1 July 1993, unreported) at 37 |

| 
| 
Bell v The Queen (1994) 77 ACrimR 213
R v Rondo (2001) 126 ACrimR 562 (NSWCCA), [15]
R v Day (2002) 129 ACrimR 198 (SA CCA), [48]
Norton v The Queen (No 2) (2001) 24 WAR 488 (WASCA)
Kelly v The Queen (2004) 205 ALR 274 (HCA), [28] |
|