BIBLIOGRAPHY
Updates and background for this project (Digest)
ALBERTA LAW REFORM INSTITUTE, Reform of the Intestate Succession Act (Final Report No 78, 1999)
CRETNEY, S M, “Reform of intestacy: the best we can do?” (1995) 111 Law Quarterly Review 77
DUNHAM, A, “The method, process and frequency of wealth transmission at death” (1963) 30 University of Chicago Law Review 241
ENGLAND, Report of the Committee on the Law of Intestate Succession (Cmd 8310, 1951)
FELLOWS, M L, SIMON, R J and RAU, W, “Public attitudes about property distribution at death and intestate succession laws in the United States” [1978] American Bar Foundation Research Journal 319
GLUCKSMAN, J R, “Intestate succession in New Jersey: does it conform to popular expectations?” (1976) 12 Journal of Law and Social Problems 253
HIRSCH, A J, “Default rules in inheritance law: a problem in search of its context” (2004) 73 Fordham Law Review 1031
JOHNSON, M K and ROBBENOLT, J K, “Using social science to inform the law of intestacy: the case of unmarried committed partners” (1998) 22(5) Law and Human Behavior 479
KHOO, S A and McDONALD, P, The Transformation of Australia’s Population 1970-2030 (UNSW Press, Sydney, 2003)
NEW SOUTH WALES LAW REFORM COMMISSION, Uniform Succession Laws: Intestacy (Issues Paper 26, April 2005)
LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, Statutory Succession Rights (Working Paper No. 35, 1982)
SUSSMAN, M B, CATES, J N and SMITH, D T, The Family and Inheritance (Russell Sage Foundation, USA, 1970)
